Schapelle Corby in a written request to the Australian Consul in Bali, asked that the drugs said to be in her possession be forensically tested and a sample be given to the AFP for that purpose. That request was refused by the Bali Police. What was their reason for refusing a request for evidence to be tested? Would they have been embarrassed if the AFP found it was Indonesian weed? How would they have reacted?
Below is the document that lays out the rules for cooperation between Indonesia and Australia in relation to criminal matters. Have a read and see if you can find any reason for refusal by the Bali police for forensic testing.
http://untreaty.un.org/unts/144078_158780/16/7/7481.pdf
4. The Requested State shall promptly inform the Requesting State of a decision of the
Requested State not to comply in whole or in part with a request for assistance and the reason
for that decision.
Schapelle Corby was unjustly jailed in Indonesia. Why was she denied access to all evidence that could potentially clear her. Why did the Bali police say fingerprinting was not necessary? Why was the baggage not weighed as requested by Corby. Why was DNA testing refused to determine country of origin? What happened to all the security tapes at three International airports on the same day? Australia needs answers to these questions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are open for anyone but may be moderated for content if totally unsuitable for publication.